This year, DORIS Meissner, Commissioner of the INS, signed the Flores transaction contract. The agreement included several important concessions from the government: as part of the agreement, the INS is required to place minors in the least restrictive environment, adapted to the child`s age and specific needs, including rights, safe and sanitary facilities, toilets and sinks, drinking water and food, medical aid, temperature control. , monitoring and contact with family members. On June 19, 2018, Marc Short, White House Director of Legislative Affairs, said that the Trump administration had asked Congress for legal relief from the Flores colonization proposal: “In each of our negotiations over the past 18 months, with all immigration laws, we have asked for a solution for the Flores Colony that , in our opinion, it is necessary 20 days before you have to release the children and, in fact, parents with children are put in condition.”  According to President Trump`s Congressional Research Service (CRS) report, On June 20, 2018, Jeff Sessions, then U.S. Attorney General, ordered Judge Dolly M. Gee of the Central District Court of California, Los Angeles, which oversees the settlement of the Flores Agreement, to “modify the agreement” to “allow the government to keep extraterrestrial families united for the duration of the family immigration process.” , as well as the criminalization of criminal proceedings. for illegal entry into the United States.  The Executive Regulation repealed the family separation policy and instructed the U.S. armed forces to provide space for military bases for family detentions, and asked the California District Court to be flexible in the provisions of the transaction requiring state authorization for family prisons and limiting the imprisonment of immigrant children to 20 days.
arrest families for the duration of their immigration trials.   On July 9, 2018, Gee dismissed the application, stating that there was no basis for amending the agreement and indicated that it was rather an issue that Parliament had to resolve.  6 “Slipping through the Cracks: Unaccompanied Children Detained by the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service,” Human Rights Watch Children`s Rights Project, April 1997. The resolution of the family separation crisis on the U.S.-Mexico border, the Trump administration has decided, is to get rid of a 1997 federal court ruling that strictly limits the government`s ability to keep children in custody. And yet, even after this landslide victory, the complaints and pressure from activist groups have not eased. For example, a 1997 human rights book, Slipping Through the Cracks, stated that the NSO still did not comply with the terms of the Reno v. Flores Supreme Court decision.
After interviews with INS officials and guided visits to institutions, the authors argued that the attitude of NSI officers ranged from apathetic to “bad will” towards imprisoned UACs and that UAC conditions of detention were still poor.6 The agreement required that children be ready as quickly as possible, or to their parents. , either to a legal guardian, another parent or a controlled institution. custody of the child has been released.